July 16, 2024


Digitally first class

Here’s how Qualcomm’s new laptop chips really stack up to Apple, Intel, and AMD

Here’s how Qualcomm’s new laptop chips really stack up to Apple, Intel, and AMD

Here’s how Qualcomm’s new laptop chips really stack up to Apple, Intel, and AMD

The laptop market has always been a battleground for innovation, performance, and efficiency. Recently, Qualcomm has entered the fray with its new laptop chips, aiming to challenge established giants like Apple, Intel, and AMD. Here’s how Qualcomm’s new laptop chips really stack up to Apple, Intel, and AMD, providing a comprehensive comparison in terms of performance, power efficiency, and overall user experience.

Qualcomm’s Entry into the Laptop Market

Qualcomm, a company renowned for its dominance in the smartphone processor market, has now ventured into the laptop domain with its Snapdragon series. These chips, designed with ARM architecture, promise to deliver a blend of performance and efficiency tailored for mobile computing. Qualcomm’s latest offerings, including the Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, have garnered significant attention for their potential to disrupt the status quo.

Performance Metrics: Speed and Efficiency

When evaluating how Qualcomm’s new laptop chips really stack up to Apple, Intel, and AMD, performance is a crucial metric. Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 boasts an octa-core CPU with a combination of high-performance and high-efficiency cores. This design is intended to handle demanding tasks while optimizing power consumption.

Apple’s M1 chip, built on ARM architecture, has set a high benchmark with its seamless integration of CPU, GPU, and neural engine. The M1’s unified memory architecture significantly enhances performance and efficiency, making it a formidable competitor. In benchmarks, the M1 has consistently outperformed many traditional x86 processors from Intel and AMD, particularly in tasks that benefit from its architecture.

Intel, with its Tiger Lake and Alder Lake processors, continues to dominate the high-performance laptop segment. These chips, leveraging x86 architecture, offer robust multi-core performance and advanced features like Thunderbolt 4 and integrated graphics enhancements. Intel’s focus on boosting single-threaded performance has been a key differentiator.

AMD’s Ryzen series, particularly the Ryzen 5000 mobile processors, have earned acclaim for their excellent multi-threaded performance and energy efficiency. Built on the Zen 3 architecture, AMD chips deliver impressive computational power, making them suitable for both gaming and productivity tasks.

In direct comparisons, Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 holds its ground in energy efficiency but falls slightly behind in raw computational power compared to Apple’s M1 and the higher-end chips from Intel and AMD. However, its performance is more than adequate for everyday tasks, media consumption, and light productivity work.

Battery Life and Power Efficiency

One of Qualcomm’s strongest selling points is power efficiency. Snapdragon processors are designed with mobile devices in mind, ensuring minimal power consumption without sacrificing performance. This results in extended battery life, a critical factor for laptops.

Apple’s M1 chip also excels in power efficiency. The integration of high-performance and high-efficiency cores allows the M1 to deliver robust performance while maintaining impressive battery life. Users report up to 20 hours of usage on MacBooks equipped with the M1, setting a new standard in the industry.

Intel’s recent advancements have focused on improving power efficiency, but historically, their x86 architecture has consumed more power compared to ARM-based designs. The Alder Lake series aims to address this with a hybrid architecture, but battery life remains a competitive edge for Qualcomm and Apple.

AMD’s Ryzen mobile processors offer a balanced approach, delivering solid performance with respectable power efficiency. While not as power-efficient as the M1 or Snapdragon, Ryzen chips provide a good compromise, especially in laptops designed for both performance and mobility.

In this aspect, Qualcomm’s new laptop chips really stack up well, offering exceptional battery life that rivals or even surpasses Apple’s M1 in some scenarios. This makes Qualcomm a strong contender for users prioritizing portability and extended use without frequent recharging.

Integrated Connectivity and Features

Qualcomm’s expertise in mobile technology translates into superior connectivity options for its laptop chips. The Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 includes integrated 5G support, Wi-Fi 6, and advanced Bluetooth capabilities. This integration ensures seamless connectivity, crucial for remote work and on-the-go productivity.

Apple’s M1 also supports advanced connectivity features, including Wi-Fi 6 and Thunderbolt 4. However, it lacks built-in 5G support, relying on external modems for such capabilities. This is a slight disadvantage compared to Qualcomm’s fully integrated approach.

Intel’s Tiger Lake and Alder Lake processors feature robust connectivity options, including Thunderbolt 4, Wi-Fi 6/6E, and, in some cases, support for 5G via external modems. Intel’s strong suit lies in its comprehensive ecosystem support, catering to a wide range of peripherals and accessories.

AMD’s Ryzen processors offer competitive connectivity features, including Wi-Fi 6 and support for high-speed data transfer interfaces. However, like Intel, AMD does not provide integrated 5G support, positioning Qualcomm’s chips ahead in this specific aspect.

When considering how Qualcomm’s new laptop chips really stack up to Apple, Intel, and AMD in terms of connectivity, Qualcomm’s integration of 5G gives it a unique advantage, particularly for users requiring constant and fast internet access.

Software and Ecosystem Compatibility

The transition to ARM-based processors presents challenges and opportunities in software compatibility. Qualcomm’s Snapdragon chips, running Windows on ARM, have seen improvements in application support, but there are still compatibility gaps with some legacy x86 applications. Microsoft’s ongoing development efforts aim to bridge these gaps, enhancing the overall user experience.

Apple’s M1, benefitting from Apple’s control over both hardware and software, offers seamless compatibility with macOS applications. The Rosetta 2 translation layer allows x86 applications to run efficiently on the M1, easing the transition for users and developers alike.

Intel and AMD, with their x86 architecture, enjoy broad compatibility with existing software ecosystems. This legacy support remains a significant advantage, ensuring that users can run a wide range of applications without compatibility issues.

In summary, while Qualcomm is making strides in software compatibility, Apple’s M1 currently offers a more seamless experience. Intel and AMD maintain their stronghold with extensive support for existing software, catering to professional environments and gaming.


Here’s how Qualcomm’s new laptop chips really stack up to Apple, Intel, and AMD: Qualcomm has carved a niche for itself with exceptional power efficiency, integrated connectivity, and competitive performance for everyday tasks. Apple’s M1 leads in raw performance and ecosystem integration, offering a seamless user experience. Intel continues to deliver high performance with broad software compatibility, while AMD provides a balanced approach with strong multi-threaded capabilities.

Each contender brings unique strengths to the table. Qualcomm’s focus on mobile efficiency and connectivity positions it as a compelling choice for users prioritizing battery life and portability. Apple’s M1 sets new performance benchmarks, Intel’s robust ecosystem support caters to diverse needs, and AMD’s Ryzen series offers impressive multi-threaded performance.

As the landscape evolves, the competition among Qualcomm, Apple, Intel, and AMD will drive further innovations, ultimately benefiting consumers with more choices and enhanced computing experiences.