[ad_1]
from the grapevine dept
This week, our 1st put winner on the insightful facet is That One Male with a comment about how Murdoch-pushed social media news taxes in some countries have manufactured Fb get rid of fascination in news:
Appeasement doesn’t get the job done? What a shock
Give an inch and they demanded a mile, who could have seen that coming from an marketplace that thinks they are owed revenue from the folks sending website traffic to them for free of charge?
Awesome that Fb at lease may well have caught on that no amount of money of cash will at any time be more than enough for the parasitic publishers, I look forward to future posts the place they’ll be screaming about how Fb removing any back links to their stuff is an abuse of ability and the federal government requires to move in and pressure them to have and shell out for information.
In 2nd put, it’s Keroberos with a remark about the ethical panic research displaying Instagram makes some adolescents feel even worse about them selves:
That chart is meaningless. Instagram tends to make some teenagers experience worse about themselves. In contrast to what? I’d be willing to guess that if you requested that same issue of teens (or any individual, for that matter), but transformed the word “Instagram” with any other put the place they could possibly interact with others (school, home, operate, the shopping mall, a celebration, just about anyplace), you’d get almost identical figures. About 50 % would say it had no influence, about a quarter would say it experienced a positive effect, and about a quarter would say it was negative. That chart has some variation, but for the most section appears to be like an practically normal distribution and basically skewed towards the positive in its place of the damaging.
For editor’s alternative on the insightful side, we have bought two additional remarks about the social media information taxes. First, it is one particular a lot more from That 1 Guy, boosting a crucial point about these schemes:
And that is why the larger sized publishers have attempted to make it lawfully impossible to not cost income for back links with regulations like this, due to the fact they know the more compact stores will make crystal clear that people can backlink to them for almost nothing and totally undermine the parasites hoping to desire cash.
Following, it’s That Nameless Coward with a common comment about the predicament:
You wanted us much more than we necessary you…
(shamelessly stolen I neglect where and when but this type of proves this concept has usually been with us)
Hey, this golden egg is awesome.
But I wager if we cut the goose open, we could get a 2nd golden egg, and we would not have to wait for tomorrow.
Frankly, I cannot see any downsides to this plan, and I counsel we put into action it right away.
Gentlemen, sharpen your axes.
Above on the amusing facet, our very first place winner is jojo_36 with yet another comment about the social media moral worry and the Texas rep who has promised a bill to ban teenagers from the providers:
Texas proposes a different Social Media Law:
Techdirt: “Ah shit, below we go once again.”
In 2nd put, it’s z! with a comment about Elon Musk trying to get out of the Twitter offer:
What happens subsequent?
We all get a double popcorn and established back to look at.
For editor’s choice on the amusing aspect, we start off out with kvh and one extra remark about the social media stress:
I presume when Texans here 1 of their politicians preparing on banning minors from social media they imagine he’s organizing on banning minorities from social media.
At last, it is an anonymous remark about Ben Smith’s Semafor start event and his disastrous interview with Tucker Carlson:
Happy we got to hear Tucker’s point of view. He just does not have a system of his have wherever he receives to say regardless of what bullshit comes to his intellect.
Which is all for this 7 days, folks!
[ad_2]
Source link
