[ad_1]
A driver of Chinese ride-hailing service Didi drives with a phone showing a navigation map on Didi’s app, in Beijing, China July 5, 2021. REUTERS/Tingshu Wang – RC24EO9UW3RM
Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com
HONG KONG, May 24 (Reuters Breakingviews) – Brave investors might salvage value from Didi Global’s wreckage. Shareholders voted to delist China’s ride-hailing firm from the New York Stock Exchange, capping a disastrous 11-month journey that wiped 90% off Didi’s valuation since its initial public offering.
Didi’s fate now lies with China’s cybersecurity regulator, which is investigating the company over data practices. App stores have taken down Didi’s services while existing offerings are banned from registering new users. The company stressed that if it stayed in New York, it would not be able to complete the cybersecurity review.
The optimistic scenario is that regulators will allow Didi to resume operations and relist in Hong Kong. At the current $7 billion market capitalisation, Didi is trading at less than half its book value.
Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com
The risks are huge, though. Didi faces potentially damaging penalties. It might not clear Hong Kong’s tough listing requirements, which were one reason the company opted for New York in the first place. New regulations also raise fresh concerns about Didi’s growth. This white-knuckled investment ride is not for everyone. (By Robyn Mak)
Follow @Breakingviews on Twitter
(The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are their own.)
Capital Calls – More concise insights on global finance:
Richemont’s caution on China is a wake-up call read more
UK tech bid frenzy will be over before it starts read more
Stablecoin safety measures fail to fully convince read more
Twitter board’s “fool me thrice” risk read more
Peloton creditors start to spin read more
Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com
Editing by Antony Currie and Katrina Hamlin
Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.
Opinions expressed are those of the author. They do not reflect the views of Reuters News, which, under the Trust Principles, is committed to integrity, independence, and freedom from bias.
[ad_2]
Source link